Does anyone know if the FDA would expect to see that our test protocols were formally approved prior to execution? Some of our groups are wanting to use a validated electronic system to enter and log test results, but that system does not have the ability to capture e-sigs. They want to just have a test plan with a summary of testing activities approved, but not the actual protocols themselves.
The only think I can find in the FDA’s General Principles of Software Validation; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff issued January 11, 2002…section 5.2.6 is: “User site testing should follow a pre-defined written plan with a formal summary of testing and a record of formal acceptance.”
I’m also aware of the GAMP best practices below, but is there a true requirement to have the test steps formally approved?:
-Tests are executed according to a pre-defined and pre-approved test procedure (or protocol), which is established on the appropriate system or equipment specification.
-Tests should be based on formal documents held under version control according to Good Documentation Practice.
-Testing should not start before the test procedure has been approved.
Thank you in advance for any information you might have on this subject!
Michelle